BGH strengthens customer rights Banks must make fees transparent

Images for decision XI ZR 7823 from July 9, 2024.

Legal Decision on Banking Law

Important Decision in Banking Law: Customer Rights Strengthened

In a groundbreaking decision, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on July 9, 2024, in the case number XI ZR 78/23, strengthened the rights of bank customers. The case concerned whether banks must provide transparent information about fees and costs. The BGH ruled that banks are obligated to inform their customers clearly and understandably about all incurred costs before they sign a contract.

According to the judges, it is essential that the information is provided in a form that is understandable for the average customer. In the specific case, a consumer filed a lawsuit because he felt misled by insufficient information regarding the amount of the fees. The BGH reaffirmed that ambiguous or insufficient information about fees is to be considered inadmissible and that this significantly restricts consumer rights.

The decision is not only significant for the affected contractual relationship but could also have far-reaching consequences for the entire industry. Many banks must rethink their information policy to meet the new legal requirements. Industry experts pointed out that many banks in the past did not adequately inform about the fee structure. This could now have consequences for existing contracts.

Legal experts view the decision as an important step towards strengthening consumer rights. The judges made it clear that an informed decision is only possible if customers have access to all relevant information. This underscores a significant principle of consumer protection that has often been sidelined in banking.

With the new decision, banks must now pay stricter attention to how they inform their customers about costs and fees.Legislators and regulatory authorities are called upon to create suitable frameworks to ensure that this information is not only provided but also understood. The ruling could therefore have long-term effects on consumers' trust in banking services. This decision is also seen in the context of the increasing criticism regarding the transparency of banking transactions. Many consumers are confused by the multitude of fees that are hidden in contracts and are demanding more clarity. The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has now established a clear framework that gives hope for changes in banking services in favor of customers. Thus, the BGH's decision is regarded as a milestone in the development of banking law, which is of significant interest not only to the parties involved but also to all banking customers. *Author: Anita Faake, Friday, September 13, 2024*

13.09.2024