BGH VI ZR 11522 Burden of proof in traffic accidents and compensation for damages

Decision VI ZR 11522 Relevant legal aspects

Jurisdiction and Its Consequences

Jurisdiction and Its Consequences

On July 30, 2024, the Federal Court of Justice made a significant ruling in the case with the file number VI ZR 115/22. The decision had far-reaching implications for the judiciary regarding liability in road traffic and the related claims for damages.

The case dealt with the requirements for demonstrating injuries in the context of a traffic accident. The plaintiff, who had claimed damages following an accident, had to sufficiently substantiate his injuries beforehand. The Federal Court of Justice clarified that the burden of proof for physical damages does not rest solely with the plaintiff, but that the perpetrator of the accident must also actively contribute to the clarification. This position corresponds to the principles of fairness, particularly in cases where the plaintiff may be restricted in his ability to provide evidence due to injuries.

The judges emphasized that, in such situations, special care must be applied when evaluating evidence. In particular, it must be taken into account that the circumstances at the accident site are often frantic and under pressure, which complicates the documentation of injuries. The decision could lead to courts adopting a proactive role in future cases to judge fairly and facilitate victims of traffic accidents in accessing claims, according to experts.

Additionally, the court pointed out that the medical reports, which are often used to support claims for damages, should be comprehensive and comprehensible. In the past, there have been repeated discussions regarding the quality of these reports.It is all the more important that such significant evidence is critically examined in light of the new case law. This decision not only has legal significance but could also have social implications. For many victims, it means a potential relief, as these clarifications may enable them to assert their claims more effectively. It remains to be seen how this new case law will impact practice and whether future judgments will set similar standards. Experts predict that these developments could fundamentally change the legal environment for traffic accidents. The societal discussion about corresponding compensation claims is reignited by this decision, as many affected individuals now have hope for a fairer treatment of their cases. Nevertheless, there is a call for both plaintiffs and defendants to adapt to the updated legal framework in order to ensure a fair process. The decision of the Federal Court of Justice on July 30, 2024, could therefore have far-reaching consequences for case law in the field of traffic law. It sets new standards that will affect both legal professionals and society as a whole. Author: Anita Faake, Friday, September 13, 2024

13.09.2024